African Forestry Initiative Leverages Funds for Restoration

Uniting more than a dozen African governments, 11 technical partners, a range of bilateral and multilateral donors, and over $545 million in private-sector investments in service of restoring 100 million hectares of land by 2030, the African Forest Landscape Restoration Initiative (AFR100) is conservation finance on a grand scale.

Following AFR100’s launch at COP21 this winter, efforts are underway to harness the potential of this cross-sector partnership and translate its diverse funding structure and technical-assistance platform into restoration success on the ground.

Setting a Foundation for Restoration

Chameleon in Madagascar
This photo by Frank Vassen depicts a chameleon in Madagascar.

Facing trends of forest loss on the order of millions of hectares each year, topsoil loss threatening agricultural productivity, and accelerating population growth trends, African leaders and their AFR100 partners identified restoration as an opportunity to support aligned environmental and development goals through projects.

These efforts will include agroforestry, silvopastoral systems that combine forestry and livestock grazing, plantation forestry, and reforestation.

Inspired by the Bonn Challenge and catalyzed through conversations at the 2015 World Forestry Congress and an African Union forum on landscapes, African leaders sought to set and achieve an ambitious restoration goal for the continent.

With support from the African Union’s New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) technical body, World Resources Institute (WRI), and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the AFR100 initiative was announced at COP21.

“There have been successes doing restoration in Africa, but not a movement,” notes Sean DeWitt, director of the Global Restoration Initiative at WRI. “AFR100 will be a platform that connects entrepreneurs, African countries, technical support organizations, and financiers to come together behind the ambitions laid out by African leaders.” 

Financing Restoration on a Continental Scale

Funding for AFR100 projects comes from a variety of sources. The World Bank has earmarked $1 billion for the effort as part of the Africa Climate Business Plan. BMZ continues to provide support for initiative infrastructure.

Additionally, $545 million has been committed by impact investors and social entrepreneurs interested in the effort. These investments and partnerships have not been combined into an overarching fund given their varying social and environmental safeguards and requirements, but contributions can be more easily accessed and coordinated by potential restoration project leaders through the AFR100 platform.

“In the complicated landscape of funds and shifting requirements, AFR100 wants to demystify the pathways to access financing for restoration and what each requires,” DeWitt said. “It can be a bit of a labyrinth. We are still exploring ways to build capacity and communicate opportunities.”

AFR100 partners hope that over time they can develop a pipeline of bankable restoration projects and provide the enabling conditions to efficiently connect potential projects with interested investors.

Some projects are already underway.

Camille Rebelo, co-founder of EcoPlanet Bamboo, one of AFR100’s project partners, said that the company’s restoration work through bamboo cultivation on degraded lands is ongoing on former agricultural areas in South Africa and deforested areas in Ghana, with plans to scale up to as much as 40,000 hectares within the two countries in the next five years.

The projects have led to both social and environmental outcomes, Rebelo said. “When people have a secure income from our projects, you can see the transformation as people begin to invest in themselves. In addition to economic security, there are also benefits such as greater soil health, reduced erosion, improved water quality and regulation, and enhanced carbon storage.”

Building the Infrastructure for a Restoration Movement

AFR100 is supported not only by creative financing, but also technical infrastructure and other enabling resources to advance restoration in Africa. NEPAD is responsible for political mobilization engaging African governments. BMZ is coordinating with potential additional bilateral donors.

Current technical assistance work led by WRI is underway to develop briefs identifying the specific challenges, restoration priorities, investor interests, and technical assistance needs in each participating country.

Through these analyses, AFR100 technical assistance partners, such as The Nature Conservancy (TNC), International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and WRI hope to better align future support with country needs and more efficiently connect financers with bankable projects.

Charting AFR100’s Path Forward

AFR100 success will depend on many factors. “Doing things differently is always hard, and coordinating with agencies, civil society, and the private sector takes time,” DeWitt said. “Building this kind of capacity on a big scale with limited resources will certainly be a challenge. The key thing during this experimental phase will be staying responsive to stakeholder needs.”

Rebelo said she cautions against bureaucratization within AFR100 and conservation finance efforts generally. “There can be a disconnect between governments and NGOs and the private sector— time is money, and too much talk can put people off.”

As other regions, including Asia-Pacific and the Mediterranean, consider similar conservation finance platforms, AFR100 has the potential to provide a model and lessons learned for funding and achieving restoration goals at significant scale.

To comment on this article, please post in our LinkedIn group. You may also email the authors of any of the Conservation Finance Network's articles via our contact form or contact us via Twitter.